Setiap tahunnya biaya naik haji baik haji reguler maupun haji khusus / plus pasti berbeda-beda, Call/Wa. 0851-00-444-682 hal ini dikarenakan adanya perubahan komponen harga untuk kebutuhan pokok naik haji seperti biaya transportasi dan akomodasi termasuk living cost yang dibutuhkan jamaah selama berada di tanah suci sangat fluktuatif. Selain menyediakan paket-paket haji onh plus, umrah dan tour muslim sebagai bentuk layanan yang tersedia, Travel Aida Tourindo Wisata juga berusaha menghadirkan mutowif (pembimbing) ibadah umroh haji yang ahli dan mendalami bidang Fiqih Islam, terutama untuk masalah ibadah umrah dan haji.

Kami berusaha memberikan bimbingan mulai sebelum berangkat, saat pelaksanaan dan setelah ibadah haji dan umroh, ini sebagai bentuk tanggung jawab moral kami kepada jamaah, bahwa ibadah yang dijalani telah sah sesuai petunjuk Allah dan Sunnah Nabi Muhammad SAW. Travel kami juga menggunakan penerbangan yang langsung landing Madinah sehingga jamaah bisa nyaman selama perjalanan umroh bersama kami. biaya umroh november Lebak
Majelis hakim pada Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Tipikor) Jakarta, menolak keberatan (eksepsi) yang diajukan oleh terdakwa dalam kasus dugaan suap pengurusan sengketa pemilihan kepala daerah Kabupaten Lebak, Banten, dan Pilkada Lampung Selatan, Susi Tur Andayani alias Uci. "Menyatakan keberatan terdakwa Susi Tur Andayani tidak dapat diterima. Menyatakan surat dakwaan jaksa penuntut umum sah sebagai dasar untuk memeriksa dan memutus perkara," tegas ketua majelis hakim, Gosen Butar-Butar, saat membacakan putusan sela di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Tipikor), Jakarta, Senin (10/3/2014). Sementara, anggota majelis hakim 3, Sofialdi, telah mengajukan perbedaan pendapat dalam putusan sela itu. Menurutnya, surat dakwaan jaksa penuntut umum terhadap Susi Tur Andayani tidak cermat dan kabur. Sebabnya adalah, pasal yang disangkakan buat Susi tidak tepat. "Ada ketidaksesuaian dari uraian tindak pidana dengan dakwaan. Terdakwa bukan pelaku turut serta. Justru terdakwa seharusnya didakwa sebagai penerima dengan Akil Mochtar. Surat dakwaan itu obscuur (kabur) dan harus dibatalkan," jelas Hakim Sofialdi. Hakim Sofialdi telah menambahkan, seharusnya jaksa mendakwa Susi dengan pasal penyuapan khusus terhadap hakim melalui advokat. Yakni Pasal 6 ayat 1 huruf a atau b atau Pasal 6 ayat 2 Undang-Undang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi, dan bukan Pasal 12 huruf c. "Dakwaan kesatu dan kedua tidak cermat. Terdakwa seharusnya didakwa dengan pasal suap khusus terhadap hakim. Apalagi yang memberi suap adalah advokat," terang Hakim Sofialdi. Namun demikian, Hakim Ketua Gosen Butar-Butar tetap menyatakan surat dakwaan jaksa penuntut umum dan sah. "Ada perbedaan wajar. Tetapi musyawarah diambil dengan suara terbanyak. Atas putusan ini terdakwa juga berhak mengajukan upaya hukum, tapi bersamaan dalam putusan akhir," sambung Hakim Ketua Gosen Butar-Butar. Sidang lanjutan Susi Pemeriksaan perkara dilanjutkan pada Senin 17 Maret pekan depan, dengan agenda menghadirkan saksi. HAKIM TOLAK EKSEPSI SUSI TUR ANDAYANI

From sea to shining sea, or at least from one side of the Hudson to the other, politicians you have barely heard of are being accused of wrongdoing. There were so many court proceedings involving public officials on Monday that it was hard to keep up.

In Newark, two underlings of Gov. Chris Christie were arraigned on charges that they were in on the truly deranged plot to block traffic leading onto the George Washington Bridge.

Ten miles away, in Lower Manhattan, Dean G. Skelos, the leader of the New York State Senate, and his son, Adam B. Skelos, were arrested by the Federal Bureau of Investigation on accusations of far more conventional political larceny, involving a job with a sewer company for the son and commissions on title insurance and bond work.

The younger man managed to receive a 150 percent pay increase from the sewer company even though, as he said on tape, he “literally knew nothing about water or, you know, any of that stuff,” according to a criminal complaint the United States attorney’s office filed.

The success of Adam Skelos, 32, was attributed by prosecutors to his father’s influence as the leader of the Senate and as a potentate among state Republicans. The indictment can also be read as one of those unfailingly sad tales of a father who cannot stop indulging a grown son. The senator himself is not alleged to have profited from the schemes, except by being relieved of the burden of underwriting Adam.

The bridge traffic caper is its own species of crazy; what distinguishes the charges against the two Skeloses is the apparent absence of a survival instinct. It is one thing not to know anything about water or that stuff. More remarkable, if true, is the fact that the sewer machinations continued even after the former New York Assembly speaker, Sheldon Silver, was charged in January with taking bribes disguised as fees.

It was by then common gossip in political and news media circles that Senator Skelos, a Republican, the counterpart in the Senate to Mr. Silver, a Democrat, in the Assembly, could be next in line for the criminal dock. “Stay tuned,” the United States attorney, Preet Bharara said, leaving not much to the imagination.

Even though the cat had been unmistakably belled, Skelos father and son continued to talk about how to advance the interests of the sewer company, though the son did begin to use a burner cellphone, the kind people pay for in cash, with no traceable contracts.

That was indeed prudent, as prosecutors had been wiretapping the cellphones of both men. But it would seem that the burner was of limited value, because by then the prosecutors had managed to secure the help of a business executive who agreed to record calls with the Skeloses. It would further seem that the business executive was more attentive to the perils of pending investigations than the politician.

Through the end of the New York State budget negotiations in March, the hopes of the younger Skelos rested on his father’s ability to devise legislation that would benefit the sewer company. That did not pan out. But Senator Skelos did boast that he had haggled with Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, a Democrat, in a successful effort to raise a $150 million allocation for Long Island to $550 million, for what the budget called “transformative economic development projects.” It included money for the kind of work done by the sewer company.

The lawyer for Adam Skelos said he was not guilty and would win in court. Senator Skelos issued a ringing declaration that he was unequivocally innocent.

THIS was also the approach taken in New Jersey by Bill Baroni, a man of great presence and eloquence who stopped outside the federal courthouse to note that he had taken risks as a Republican by bucking his party to support paid family leave, medical marijuana and marriage equality. “I would never risk my career, my job, my reputation for something like this,” Mr. Baroni said. “I am an innocent man.”

The lawyer for his co-defendant, Bridget Anne Kelly, the former deputy chief of staff to Mr. Christie, a Republican, said that she would strongly rebut the charges.

Perhaps they had nothing to do with the lane closings. But neither Mr. Baroni nor Ms. Kelly addressed the question of why they did not return repeated calls from the mayor of Fort Lee, N.J., begging them to stop the traffic tie-ups, over three days.

That silence was a low moment. But perhaps New York hit bottom faster. Senator Skelos, the prosecutors charged, arranged to meet Long Island politicians at the wake of Wenjian Liu, a New York City police officer shot dead in December, to press for payments to the company employing his son.

Sometimes it seems as though for some people, the only thing to be ashamed of is shame itself.

Finding Scandal in New York and New Jersey, but No Shame

Artikel lainnya »